CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9] — Page 199

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

DRAFT.

194

W-Mcade.

W. Meade

I don't see why the service

"Therton" on board the

should not

4

5413/74

count, except for the reason mentioned in your minute and

the rates of salary allowances were originally fixed & subsequently

this understanding, viz. that

Lee

your

minute 12 5413/74-

in the diff

As for

I know there has been no decision of

that

antrepoint date affecting the claim to pension

for similar service on the W. Const Steamer, nor has

W-Lewes any farther notes on

As far as

otwith the decision Waspects Can

the pointi Jean judy

judge you gave excellent the m

reasons at that time for not regarding the claim service as pensionable; but at the same time appeared disposed to admit the claim

Eventually.

Should not M. Havelock be consulted before you decide on such a general question?

In Hemming

JRK

16/10/83

my.

See the latter parts

5413/14. I still think

Junite

the service should be admitted to

if to do gene think are

weed consult dettenbeth. Gringt

зна адна а

ague

A

would to the time and

have to comml

we should telepas which

am 17/0

would give sire Bt inconscineme

"revised an

the service was not pensionable. This however to my mind seems an very strong argument and the negative side of the question.

of Capt. Miluen gets the benefit

m.

""service we shall

of his "Sherbes" service also have to reckon with her Carter

Lewes in his minute on

attempts to draw a

between the two cases

on 8878

-179 Glash

destination

but

D

Sconfess

I am unable to appreciate it.

W. Canter I was refused ground that the rules of the Colonial service did not admit

his "Sherbes" service.

counted for pension. If differently

being

we decide Capt Milen affle für

in the cave of

causse

to Carter will of cas

recouton

& I don't see the

could refuse it.

on the whole I think I should be disposed not to allow the service to count as pensionable I think the weight of the argument

is against me, the the team your letter.

in 19t Mother unfly that we should give mag on the point. Telegraph this

Selegraph this 5. Bowen "Warn

"BM atoue Shan lim service not pensionable

19/10

Edit History

2026-05-23 15:36:42 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
DRAFT. 194 W-Mcade. W. Meade I don't see why the service "Therton" on board the should not 4 5413/74 count, except for the reason mentioned in your minute and the rates of salary allowances were originally fixed & subsequently this understanding, viz. that Lee your minute 12 5413/74- in the diff As for I know there has been no decision of that antrepoint date affecting the claim to pension for similar service on the W. Const Steamer, nor has W-Lewes any farther notes on As far as otwith the decision Waspects Can the pointi Jean judy judge you gave excellent the m reasons at that time for not regarding the claim service as pensionable; but at the same time appeared disposed to admit the claim Eventually. Should not M. Havelock be consulted before you decide on such a general question? In Hemming JRK 16/10/83 my. See the latter parts 5413/14. I still think Junite the service should be admitted to if to do gene think are weed consult dettenbeth. Gringt зна адна а ague A would to the time and have to comml we should telepas which am 17/0 would give sire Bt inconscineme "revised an the service was not pensionable. This however to my mind seems an very strong argument and the negative side of the question. of Capt. Miluen gets the benefit m. ""service we shall of his "Sherbes" service also have to reckon with her Carter Lewes in his minute on attempts to draw a between the two cases on 8878 -179 Glash destination but D Sconfess I am unable to appreciate it. W. Canter I was refused ground that the rules of the Colonial service did not admit his "Sherbes" service. counted for pension. If differently being we decide Capt Milen affle für in the cave of causse to Carter will of cas recouton & I don't see the could refuse it. on the whole I think I should be disposed not to allow the service to count as pensionable I think the weight of the argument is against me, the the team your letter. in 19t Mother unfly that we should give mag on the point. Telegraph this Selegraph this 5. Bowen "Warn "BM atoue Shan lim service not pensionable 19/10
Baseline (Original)
DRAFT. 194 W-Mcade. W. Meade I don't see why the service "Therton' on board the should not 4 5413/74 caunt, except for the reasoin mentioned in your minute and the rates of salary allowances were originally fixed & subsequently this understanding, viz. that Lee your minute 12 5413/74- in the diff As for I know there has been no decision of that antrepoint date affecting the claim to pension for similar service on the W. Const Steamer, nor has W-Lewes any farther notes on As far as otwith the decisin Waspects Can the pointi Jean judy judge you gave excellent the m reasons at that time for not regarding the alain service as persimable; but at the same time appeared disposed to admit the claim Eventually. Should not M. Havelock be connected before you decide on such a general question? In Hemming JRK 16/10/83 my. See the latter parts 5413/14. I still think Juinte the service should be admitted to if to do gene think are weed consult dettenbeth. Gringt зна адна а ague A would to the time and have to comml we should telepas which am 17/0 would give sire Bt inconscineme "revised an the serince was not pensionable. This however to my mind seems an very strong argument and the negative side of the question. of Capt. Miluen gets the benefit m. ""service we shall of his "Sherbes" service also have to reckon with her Carter Lewes in his muinate on attempts to draw a between the two cases on 8878 -179 Glash destination but D Sconfess I am unable to appreciate it. W. Canter I was refused ground that the rules of the Colonial service did not admit his "Sherbes" service. counted for pension. If differently being we decide Capt Milen affle für in the cave of causse to Carter will of cas recouton & I don't see the could refuse it. on the whole Ithink I should be dispared not to allow the service to count as pensionable Ithink the weight of the argumentet is agito me, the the team your letter. in 19t Mother unfly that we showed give mag on the point. Telegraph thi Selegraph thi 5. Bowen "Warn "BM atoue Shan lim senice not peusionable 19/10
2026-05-23 15:36:42 · Baseline
View content

DRAFT.

194

W-Mcade.

W. Meade

I don't see why the service

"Therton' on board the

should not

4

5413/74

caunt, except for the reasoin mentioned in your minute and

the rates of salary allowances were originally fixed & subsequently

this understanding, viz. that

Lee

your

minute 12 5413/74-

in the diff

As for

I know there has been no decision of

that

antrepoint date affecting the claim to pension

for similar service on the W. Const Steamer, nor has

W-Lewes any farther notes on

As far as

otwith the decisin Waspects Can

the pointi Jean judy

judge you gave excellent the m

reasons at that time for not regarding the alain service as persimable; but at the same time appeared disposed to admit the claim

Eventually.

Should not M. Havelock be connected before you decide on such a general question?

In Hemming

JRK

16/10/83

my.

See the latter parts

5413/14. I still think

Juinte

the service should be admitted to

if to do gene think are

weed consult dettenbeth. Gringt

зна адна а

ague

A

would to the time and

have to comml

we should telepas which

am 17/0

would give sire Bt inconscineme

"revised an

the serince was not pensionable. This however to my mind seems an very strong argument and the negative side of the question.

of Capt. Miluen gets the benefit

m.

""service we shall

of his "Sherbes" service also have to reckon with her Carter

Lewes in his muinate on

attempts to draw a

between the two cases

on 8878

-179 Glash

destination

but

D

Sconfess

I am unable to appreciate it.

W. Canter I was refused ground that the rules of the Colonial service did not admit

his "Sherbes" service.

counted for pension. If differently

being

we decide Capt Milen affle für

in the cave of

causse

to Carter will of cas

recouton

& I don't see the

could refuse it.

on the whole Ithink I should be dispared not to allow the service to count as pensionable Ithink the weight of the argumentet

is agito me, the the team your letter.

in 19t Mother unfly that we showed give mag on the point. Telegraph thi

Selegraph thi 5. Bowen "Warn

"BM atoue Shan lim senice not peusionable

19/10

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.